Sunday, March 23, 2014

Week 3/24: Metaphysics notes

Aristotle’s Metaphysics
Content outline:
·      Introduction
·      Summary of the 14 books
·      Sources for additional reading
·      Applications to biomedicine
·      Discussion questions
Introduction
Aristotle was the student of Plato. He was a master systematizer. His efforts to classify and categorize don’t stop with nature, in the works entitled metaphysics he theorizes on what makes humans human.    
Metaphysics is fourteen books of Aristotle’s writings that were later grouped together by editor(s). Scholars postulate that what we now know as Metaphysics were actually lecture notes. With this in mind the disjointed ordering of topics and the extremely compressed delivery of ideas makes more sense. Aristotle never actually uses the term ‘metaphysics’ in his writings, instead a first century editor(s) evidently coined the name, where ‘metaphysics’—literally means ‘after the Physics’.
Aristotle does describe ‘first philosophies’ though, which are principles of the most fundamental or at the highest level of generality – they are the most abstract and should be studied after studied nature (which is the subject matter of the Physics). This is in contrast to second philosophy, which is the study of nature.
More specifically the works of metaphysics focus on “the study of being qua being’ where qua means ‘in so far as’ or “in its capacity as” - more simply the study of things that can be said to be.
In Categories, Aristotle defines fundamental categories of being: substance, quantity, quality, relation, location, time, position, possession, doing, and undergoing – but he doesn’t define an all-encompassing definition of being – this is what metaphysics endeavors to accomplish.
Each academic discipline studies a certain aspect of a topic – for example lets think about humans.  Biologists study humans in their capacity as living organisms, psychologists study humans in their capacity as beings with minds and consciousness, and anthropologists study humans in their capacity as social beings. A metaphysician, by contrast, would study humans in their capacity as beings that exist. More succinctly put - metaphysics investigates the reason that there should be being at all, whereas the other sciences study the reasons behind various manifestations of being. So basically fundamentally understanding what makes humans human – answers that are immutable, and independent of matter.
SUMMARY OF THE 14 BOOKS
The reading provided by Dr Rice is Book A, chapters 1&2 of the metaphysics works. There are 13 more books that are summarized below.
1. Book I (alpha) First Causes and Principles
v Animals live by appearance and memory whereas humans live by art and reason
v Knowledge consists of particular truths that we learn through experience and the general truths of art and science.
v Wisdom consists in understanding the most general truths of all, which are the fundamental principles and causes that govern everything. Wisdom is not known by the senses or experience.
v Knowing the cause trumps experience.
v Science of the primary causes (how things are) can be divided into four explanations:
1.    Substance - what a thing is made of
2.    Material - the form a thing assumes
3.    Guiding principles - the process by which it came into being
4.    The purpose it serves

2. Book II (small alpha or alpha the lesser) Principles of Physics and Methods
v The method of study depends on the subject being studied and the aptitude of the investigator
v Math is the best method, but not suitable for all studies
v Philosophy is theoretical science of truth.
3. Book III (Beta) is a series of questions that are extreme positions to be used as teaching tools to better understand metaphysics.
 [http://catpages.nwmissouri.edu/m/rfield/nwcourses/570/beta.pdf]
4. Book IV (Gamma): On Being and First Principles
v This is a deep dive into investigation being itself.
Ø  More specifically ‘being qua being’ amounts to the search into first principles and causes.
Ø  “For some things are called beings because they are substances, other because they are attributes of substances, others because they are a road to substances”
v The principle of noncontradiction is introduced- nothing can both be something and not be that same something
v The concept of the excluded middle
Ø  There is no middle position between two contradictory positions
Ø  thing is either x or not-x, and there is no third possibility
[http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/Metaphysics.pdf]
5. Book V Delta: approximately 40 critical terms and definitions
6. Book VI Epsilon: Categorizing the sciences and accidents
v Science can be either productive, practical or theoretical
v In addition to physics and mathematics there are theoretical sciences like theology, which studies first principles causes, and the eternal.
v 4 ways of being: accidental being, being as truth, the category of being, and being in actuality and potentiality.
v Accidental being covers the kinds of properties that are not essential to a thing described. Accidental being must have a kind of accidental causation, which we might associate with chance.
 [http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.6.vi.html]

7. Book VII Zeta: The Substance
v 17 chapters that address substance (ousia)
v Four possible candidates for describing the substance of something
1.    essence: the what it is; virtue of itself
2.    universal: are definable and in contrast to particulars
3.    genus: in the scientific sense  
4.    substratum: matter of an object is the stuff that makes it up, whereas the form is the shape that stuff takes.
a.    matter (the bronze)
b.    shape (the plan of the form of bronze)
c.     the compound of matter and shape (the bronze statue)
8. Book VIII Eta: summary of zeta
9. Book IX Theta potentiality and actuality of change
·      Potentiality: a principle of change in another thing, identifies with matter
·      Actuality: the completed state of something that had the potential to be completed, identifies with form
o   all potentialities must eventually be realized: if a potentiality never becomes an actuality, then we do not call it a potentiality but an impossibility.

o   Rational: change initiated by a rational agent, can produce opposites
o   Irrational: happens naturally
v Actions
§  incomplete:  actions do not contain their purpose, part of a process
§  complete: end in itself
10. Book X Iota: unity and contrary attributes
·      Unity is not a substance
o   it is a universal, not a species it
o   is always a property of something else
·      Contray attributes are the maximum difference and hold between two extreme
 [http://www.philosophie.hu-berlin.de/institut/lehrbereiche/antike/mitarbeiter/menn/texte/ig2a]
Book 11 Kappa:  Summary of the being and becoming
·      Some scholars doubt Aristotle was the author
·      Repeats concepts from Physics or in earlier books of the Metaphysics.
Book 12 Lambda Theology, the Prime Mover and God(s)
·      Three kinds of substance:
o   perceptible substances: perishable or imperishable
§  subject of natural science
o   substance that is immune to change
§  subject of logic and mathematics.
·      Theology investigates the question of whether there is some common source to all substance, and Aristotle identifies this common source as a divine “prime mover.”
·      This eternal substance has no potentiality, but only actuality, and its perpetual actuality makes the world eternal as well. This eternal substance must also be the prime mover, the source of all movement and change in the cosmos. To be the primer mover, this substance must itself be unmoving.
·      Vacillates between a single or multiple prime movers.


Books 13 Mu and 14 Nu: Philosophy of mathematics, how numbers exist
·      Mathematical entities are not substances
·      Numbers are physical objects considered in abstraction from their physical and accidental properties
·      Disagrees with Plato’s view that each number corresponds to a Form

SOURCES FOR FURTHER READING:
·      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Aristotle’s Metaphysics.
·      Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Aristotle: Metaphysics.
APPLICATIONS TO BIOMEDICINE
Outside of philosophy circles, Aristotle’s metaphysics principles are often applied in bioethics – specifically surrounding the use and destruction of embryos and stem cells. Below are a section of articles that employ metaphysical principles.
·      Morgan, L. M. (2013). The potentiality principle from Aristotle to abortion. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), S15-S25.
·      Mosteller, T. (2005). Aristotle and headless clones. Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 26(4), 339-350.
·      Watt, H. (2007). Embryos and pseudoembryos: parthenotes, reprogrammed oocytes and headless clones. Journal of medical ethics, 33(9), 554-556.
Another metaphysical principle applied to biomedicine is causation.
·      Sunday, J., Eyles, J., & Upshur, R. (2001). Applying Aristotle's doctrine of causation to Aboriginal and biomedical understandings of diabetes. Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 25(1), 63-85.
·      Wildner, M. (2000). Aristotle and the human genome project. The Lancet, 356(9238), 1360.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
·      In your opinion what makes humans human – in other words – what qualities are inherent to our species and unique from all others? What is the essence of our being?
o   What makes something an embryo versus a clump of cells (Watt, 2007; Morgan 2013)?
o   Are (how are?) humans more than the just the result of their genetic material (Wildner, 2000)?
·      More mundane – what makes a thing a thing?
·      How do different interpretations of causation influence behavior? (Sunday, 2001)
·      Which of the book beta questions strike you are particularly relevant to your field of study?
·      Do you connect with Aristotle’s approach of categorization?
·      Using the categories and criteria from Metaphysics where do you weigh in on the ethics of therapeutic cloning (Mosteller, 2005)?